Is Germany Covertly Experimenting On Embryos?

Polish Justice Minister Jaroslaw Gowin

In an interview with TVN24 on Sunday, Polish Justice Minister Jaroslaw Gowin claimed that embryos from Polish clinics are sold to Germany, where they are used as material for scientific experiments. �German scientists are importing embryos from other countries - including Poland - and are conducting experiments on them.�

This is despite that Germany, like most modern states, claims not to get involved in such experiments.





Gowin claims that Polish in-vitro fertilization clinics are engaged in selling embryos. He said that he was informed of such cases five years ago from doctors working in IVF clinics, but could not ask prosecutors to investigate as he had no data on specific sites involved in these activities, in order to commence a criminal investigation.

Mr Gowin also said that there is a loophole in Polish law on in-vitro, and selling and buying embryos is not forbidden. He added that a bioethics draft law was prepared five years ago but politicians are not interested in pushing it through.

In a statement sent to Polish Radio, the German embassy in Warsaw stressed that it has no information that Germany has purchased Polish embryos.

Is Germany still playing with Eugenics?

As we mentioned in this post from 2011, German researchers working under Svante P��bo, the director of the Department of Genetics at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, are still working on the idea that there are two levels of human.

In Nazi race science, the views of evolution were scorned. The main element of this was the idea that humans derived from two entirely separate species, rather than the evolution of one.
This separation, fed the German superiority beliefs so that 'ethnic-Germans' were derived from a higher species, the modern human; and Russians, eastern-europeans, Greeks, Jews, Roma, Afro-Carribeans, and anyone else Germans felt superior to, belonged to the "Untermenschen" or underclass, degenerate, sub-human, neanderthal group.

These views were the motivator and catalyst used for Eugenics and Genocide. This can also be linked to the view of "ethnic-Germans"

The idea that Germany may be covertly buying embryos for experimentation, no doubt linked to the above views, is alarming to say the least.

Turkish Deputy PM Speaks Out About German/Nazi Suspicions

As we mentioned previously, the trial of a neo-Nazi in Germany was largely condemned before it started, as the Bavarian Courts had excluded Turkish media from being present at the trial - despite the fact that the trial concerns murders by the neo-Nazi group NSU of a number of Turkish people.

Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Bozdag

The neo-Nazi murder trial in Germany does not have any significance anymore for Turkey, since the result is pre-determined, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bekir Bozdag has said.

�The ruling of the Munich State High Court will have no significance from now on for me,� Bozdag told Anatolia news agency. �The court has not started the trial yet. But this is a court that ended the trial even before it started.�

Germany's highest court postponed the start of the trial early this week after announcing an overhaul of disputed rules on media access.

Proceedings were to have begun on April 17 against a woman accused of being part of a Nazi cell blamed for 10 murders. But after Germany�s top court ordered the Munich judges last week to expand foreign media access to the trial, its starting date had to be put back, in a move victims groups called a �catastrophe.� Hearings are now to begin on May 6, the court said.
Beate Zschaepe, believed to be the last surviving member of a gang known as the National Socialist Underground (NSU) accused of killing eight Turks, a Greek man and a German policewoman between 2000 and 2007, is to stand trial with four alleged accomplices.

Bozdag stressed that there is an atmosphere that the trial is a show, for �completing routines.�

�The court chief has lost his neutrality. You cannot expect a justice from a trial whose head lost his neutrality. This trial is over for us, we are waiting the result as a mere formality.�

We are waiting for confirmation of the specifics Bozdag refers to, however as we mentioned prviously, Germany uses this court when Nazis are on trial because members of this court are linked to the Nazi charity 'Stille Hilfe'.

Expanding on other concerns linked to Germany, Bozdag has called on German authorities to investigate claims that two recent fires may have been racially motivated.

"The German authorities and police should take into consideration the claims that neo-Nazis or other groups may be involved in perpetrating arson. All the questions regarding the incidents should be asked, their possible answers should be determined and the public should be informed about the answers by German authorities,"

Bozdag's comments come after two fires ripped through apartment buildings in Cologne and Stuttgart in March, killing 10 people.

Those apartments housed residents primarily of Turkish descent



As ever, it is impossible to tell where German intelligence ends and neo-Nazism begins.

German MEP Expresses Disgust At Germany's Treatment Of Neighbours

Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, an MEP with the liberal Free Democrats (FDP), the junior party in Angela Merkel's governing coalition, says he is so "fed up with German hypocrisy" in its dealings with Europe he can no longer speak for the country.


In an interview with the Guardian, Chatzimarkakis, who was born in Germany to Greek migrant workers and has dual nationality, accused Berlin of bullying the EU's poorer member states and indulging in the very practices it sought to stamp out.

"Germany is setting the European house on fire. I don't want to be with those playing with fire. I would rather be with those in the fire brigade," said Chatzimarkakis, who recently announced that he would be resigning from German politics after representing Germany in the European parliament for the past nine years.

"Germany is focused on national interests much more than EU interests," said the 47-year-old, who did not rule out standing for re-election with a Greek party when euro elections are next held in May 2014. "It is regarded as the hegemon but is not behaving as the hegemon and that is shown by the stereotypes that are used in the Greek case and, even more, the Cypriot case.

"The Germans in their hearts believe it is OK to bribe if it leads to more profit. They have a totally different attitude to corruption as the donor [party]. Many regard themselves as not guilty if they give," he said, listing German companies that he said handed out kickbacks to secure multimillion pound contracts. "The guilty ones are those who take � this is the sort of hypocrisy that I am personally fed up with."

The politician said he had been left shocked by the country's handling of the continent's worsening economic crisis.

"Members of my own party, liberals, came up with the idea of selling Greek islands and the Parthenon because it was an easy way to win votes," he said. "Merkel herself gave a speech to party members saying the eurozone wouldn't survive if countries in the south continued to take long holidays. She used this stereotype and it was not backed by real data, because the reality is that Greeks, for example, work a lot longer than Germans do."

Berlin's treatment of Cyprus had been the last straw, he said. The island was the best proof yet that double standards in the bloc were now at play.

"Look at the money-laundering that is taking place in Germany," he said. "It is well proven that up to �60bn is laundered in Germany every year. How can a country like Germany then accuse a small country like Cyprus of being nothing else than a criminal money-washing system and at the same time execute a whole economy within a fortnight just to send a message to German voters [in September's general election]?" he asked. "It is unbelievable!"

Such behaviour, Chatzimarkakis argued, had aggravated the growing north-south divide in Europe and contributed to the "bad climate" in the EU. It had also created a hostile atmosphere towards German politicians in the European parliament.

With its dogged emphasis on austerity as the only way out of the crisis, he claimed Berlin had become increasingly isolated and out of touch with its partners even if it remained the biggest provider of bailout funds to indebted nations in the south.

"The atmosphere has become tougher in the EP and I'm afraid we won't be able to wait until the German elections to fix it," averred the MEP, saying visiting German MPS on the country's budget committee had expressed surprise that hostility should exist at all.

"A group of us met them last week and they asked us 'is it really true that everyone is against us?' The question, alone, shows you the level of unawareness. They think all this anger is a media phenomenon and nothing to do with reality."

It was urgent, he insisted, that the German government not only "put things right" but stop "a very dangerous policy" for Europe and European integration.

"It should start, possibly, by apologising to Cyprus, at least symbolically," Chatzimarkakis said.

"We have a shadow state that is governing Europe," he added referring to the continent's increasingly dominant eurotocracy. "I am specifically thinking of the euro group, the troika, the European commission, bodies that the German government hides behind and all too often controls."

Germany Defaults - And Lies About It

GREECE, Italy, and now Cyprus, are all in the process of claims for unpaid German war debts.

Germany in turn currently pretends to be the leading light of fiscal responsibility (its not there in reality, hence they have to propagandise it), whilst having tried some truely jaw dropping manuevers in an attempt to avoid payment or allowing markets to smell blood. They are in default! Yet they have covered it up like this:

It started in the 1920�s when Germany issued series of bearer bonds in the USA for revitalisation of its economy following the devastating effects of WWI. Acting as trustees, financial institutions such as JP Morgan and Lee Higgins & Co. produced and sold bonds in America raising funds that would be invested in Germany.

These bonds corresponded to Agricultural Loans signed by 14 German banks and guaranteed by the German government. Of these 14 banks four are still active and are part of the troika mechanism.
From 1933, Germany defaulted on interest repayments to Bondholders, as the new Nazi leadership considered the debt that Germany faced following WWI as illegal and issued a moratorium on bonds owed to foreign investors.

In 1953 following years of German debt crisis, the London Debt Agreement restructured Germany�s debt to be sustainable by the agreement of its creditors.

The way this deal would function was to provide the option to the bondholders of German debt, to either accept the repayment terms of the LDA, or to forego attempts to claim their debt until 1993. The rationale being, that you can cash in today from a weak Germany, or wait for a full settlement after 40 years of German growth and development.

Assenting Bondholders: For bondholders who wanted to cash in their bonds immediately, they could receive partial payment, and new bonds, with a discount on the value of their bonds (depending on the issue, between 20% - 60%). For this to be implemented correctly, a procedure of Validation was set up to ensure that anyone presenting bonds for payment, could prove that they were indeed the beneficial owner. This would guarantee that all of the disbursements paid went directly to Germany�s creditors in the correct manor.

Non Assenting Bondholders: For bondholders who chose to wait for full settlement by their next generation in the future, their course of action was to maintain the debt instruments (the bonds) safely, and not request a settlement until the 40-year grace period had expired.

Validation boards were established in the three US states (where the bonds were initially sold) to carry out the compliance requirements for the bondholders who chose to accept the option presented in the LDA. Having performed their role, these boards were subsequently closed a few years later.

By 1993 the German government had succeeded in revitalising its economy and began to respond to requests for payment. Unfortunately, they chose not to honour their debt. To the surprise of many bondholders, Germany would receive payment applications with the physical bonds attached, perforate the bonds, and stamp them as invalid.

The reasons given by the German Government and its subsidiary bodies are: Germany has compiled a list of Bond serial numbers that Germany considers stolen, and hence invalid. The procedure of validation must be complied with.

The German government claims that during WWII Russian soldiers looted the Reichsbank vault, where many bonds were kept, and that these bonds were reintroduced into the market for payment. The simple problem with this claim is that the only bonds that were in the German vault, had already been paid off or pledged, for which there is a public record, and no active bondholders had their bonds physically in Germany. Furthermore, the building which housed the Reichsbank had been completely destroyed, the contents of which had been removed by Germany before the arrival of Russian soldiers to Berlin.

The bonds were �bearer� instruments, and bondholders would cut off the coupons from the papers for their interest repayments. This claim however, was acceptable in the few years immediately following the war, as it was obvious bondholders would not be able to recover their principal or interest at the time, and was the reasons for the Validation Procedure outlined in the London Debt Agreements.

The so-called �Validation Procedure� which was intended to apply to bonds that would be submitted for payment in 1953 added additional security requirements for the bondholder to comply with. Not only was it clear in the legislation that this only applied to Assenting Bondholders in 1953, subsequently indicated by the closure of the Validation boards, but it would be simply impossible for any bondholder to comply with them 40 years later.

When bondholders and creditors have asked to see this list, the German government categorically denied access, stating that it is not in their national interest, and has classified this list as a �national secret�.

What followed was a series of lawsuits in the US where German legal defence has never denied the liability for its debt, but has systematically used technical issues and delayed court cases, to the point that many bondholders have paid millions more in legal expenses. Many of these claims continue today, by some of the surviving bondholders, and the acquirers of that debt, and will be making appeals to the European Courts in the near future.

There is no question in the minds of the many experts in banking and law, with substantial knowledge of international financial instruments, that these bonds represent unpaid debt of the German government and its subsidiary bodies.

Germany has an impressive ability as a state, to escape its obligations. For over three generations the same sovereign debt has been postponed and avoided. The inheritors and purchasers of this debt have been obliged to adopt expensive and cumbersome avenues, to force the German government's hand to respect and honour its obligations, a fundamental of our modern European society.

German economic historian Albrecht Ritschl argued in 2011 that Germany was �the biggest debt transgressor of the 20th century�. �During the 20th century, Germany was responsible for what were the biggest national bankruptcies in recent history. It is only thanks to the United States, which sacrificed vast amounts of money after both World War I and World War II, that Germany is financially stable today and holds the status of Europe's headmaster. That fact, unfortunately, often seems to be forgotten,� he said.

The undeniable truth is that authenticated bank bearer bonds worth $9,750,000,000, that�s nine billion seven hundred and fifty million US dollars according to the gold price of today, owned by just one Cypriot company, issued on the back of German sovereign debt that remains unsettled. As do many other bonds from the same agreement. Germany's harsh terms over Cypriot bank deposit raids start looking more interesting from this perspective.

Germany likes to eat at the top table, and espouse how great its production is, what a rich country with great living standards it is, and to be smug to other smaller struggling EU nations.

One must consider that its easy to look like one of the big dogs when you don't pay your debts, and loot and steal wealth on a vast industrial scale.

Germany cleverly keeps the majority of its trades by-the-book, so most people never become wise to this pilfering pirate of a country. But make no mistake, Germany is taking control of banking and tax accross the whole of the EU, and because of that has no intention of paying these large debts to the 'Untermenschen' states.

Good luck claiming that money back when you don't have a sovereign bank anymore. Germany (last week) even suggested a property tax be forced on the southern Euro states, largely for German coffers! A country which denies money over decades, still owed to these Euro states from the last time Germany stole or burned everything that wasn't bolted down (and a lot which was).

This fits neatly with her little plan to crash capitalism - no more markets to shun Germany for defaulting. Its the perfect way of using capitalism itself as the very weapon with which to destroy it. Germany runs up huge debts on trust, stash the cash, default. Rinse and repeat x3.

Indeed Germany largely caused the Great Depression by purposely running up such a massive credit pyramid, that when she decided to default it collapsed the whole world financial system. They don't care about default - it means they can steal huge amounts of money from their enemies, and restart with a competitive advantage - starve their population, no problem. This is Clausewitz Total War theory in action.



This is also good news.

Germany is weak right now, twice as leveraged as the US and with huge war debts still to pay out. It needs to be done fast, as once Germany has decimated Europe financially again, there will be no getting those debts back, and market attacks will have no impact, as she will not be part of free market capitalism - she will be part of a European command economy.

If markets woke up to that, Germany could find herself in a Weimar situation sooner than she thinks...
Chase the war debts, and you are messing with their whole business model of theft and not paying (obfuscating payment demands for decades until the next write-down - Then start again, but with everybody else's money on top of everything your own economy produces).

THERE IS NO "ECONOMIC MIRACLE". IT IS A CONJURING TRICK COVERING NOTHING MORE THAN CLASSIC THEFT AND NON-PAYMENT OF DEBT.

Germany's current cooked-books debt to GDP ratio does not include the hundreds of billions in legally correct and due war debts.

One must consider that is why Germany really wanted the EUro. It was not a straight jacket for them, it was a crutch for Germany to raid everyone else's banks and secure their safety from huge debts due. It is there to make the rest of Europe pay for Germany.


Germany could crash, with a little push...